October 26, 2009

Dan Brown's The Lost Symbol - Completely lost

Barring Da Vinci Code, Dan Brown has delivered fairly unimpressive work. Couldn't say no to The Lost Symbol after it was literally handed to me on a platter - my cousin had it lying around the house when I went visiting over the weekend. Though painfully lengthy, the book got off to a good start. Suspense built up after 50-odd pages, and I started reading it in earnest. After all, the book starred Robert Langdon, and gotta admit, I find such historical suspenses set in modern times interesting.

The story begins with Prof. Langdon being called to Washington D.C., apparently by his good friend and mentor, Peter Solomon. What starts as an innocent invitation to give a lecture soon turns into a nightmare, with Peter Solomon's severed hand greeting our friend Robert Langdon in the lecture room. Yeah, spooky. A series of horrifying events follow, with Peter's sis Katherine Solomon also in the fray, and a weird, bald, tattooed man (animal is the only word for him) trying his best to kill everybody in sight.

What made me want to hurl the book at a wall towards the end was its glaring plot; maybe, if it were your first book, you might not be able to guess it, but the answer stares at you right in the face. Dan Brown obviously thought of his readers as fools. It's also a damn weak plot; hard to believe so much stuff was done, so many people were killed, for such a stupid reason. There is no feel-good factor once you reach the end; just a slight headache coupled with painful eyes, like in my case.

8 comments:

  1. It shows that you've written for a while now. But 6 /10 for u !!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Just 6/10? :'(
    Naah, 6 out of 10 is good, coming from you; knowing you, I guess I should be happy you gave me pass marks :D

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dr. Anurag Ayachit26 October 2009 at 11:17

    pretty hard review, huh?!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Atlast you crossed the hurdle.Good to see you back in the business.

    ReplyDelete
  5. the irony is i bet dan brown took quite some time to write this book......and the plot as you say is weak.....hard to believe. But i must point out murders has been the mainstay of his book....be it dan vinci code,deception point[boy watta book]...so i guess its mystery along with gore is what attracts readers....and not soft centered soles like urself....i seem to enjoy his book.Anyway nice review..and i am not qualified enough to be handing out ratings...
    CHEERS

    ReplyDelete
  6. @ Anurag - Read the book, and you'll change your mind about this review being hard :D

    @ Abhineet - Thank you Sir! :-)

    @ Andy - I heard it took him about 7 yrs. He slogged for 7 yrs and came out with this plot?! I disagree with you when you say murders have been the mainstay of his book; the one aspect that attracts readers is the way he weaves fact into fiction, and he does that so skillfully that one can never identify where fact ended, and fiction began. Of course, this has given rise to lots of controversies, but hey, that's what he wants :D

    ReplyDelete
  7. no wonder i never heard abt this book..seems only his good works got noticed,...which is good :)

    Cheers
    CRD

    keep blogging

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hey Chris, if you liked Da Vinci Code, then maybe you might want to read this one; cant say you'll like it, but hey, like Andy put it, maybe I dint like the gore. You might want to give it a try :-)

    ReplyDelete

Did you like the post? Not so much? Either way, please let me know.